| Article Index |
|---|
| Special Broadcast - 9/11 Facts |
| More |
| Funding |
| Shanksville |
| Drills |
| Report |
| War Games |
| Building 7 |
| NORAD Stand Down |
| Cheney's Stand Down Order |
| Inside Job? |
| 9/11 Media Deception |
| All Pages |
Broadcast Time: Wednesday, February 25th, 2009 8:00 PM ET.
During this special broadcast I will try to highlight some of the more disturbing elements of the official account of the events of September 11th 2001. During the years following that event, volumes of information have come to light dramatically contradicting the official account. While it would take many hours to even scratch the surface of these facts, I will use this one hour broadcast to provide a starting point for people who have not yet become aware of the many disturbing details.
The following information can be used as reference material for those who tune in:
We have posted the following bits and pieces of information simply for those of you who are not yet aware that the OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORD of 9/11 does not support the common perceptions of what took place that day. As a matter of fact the more you examine the public record the more impossible the official explanation will seem.
With the amount of information available it is virtually impossible to select the most powerful evidence, but we did try to select enough to encourage you to start your own research.
So in no particular order...here are some things to think about. Please read my comments on each item.
Thank you,
Jesse Richard
In no particular order:
Michael Meacher, British Member of Parliament, and until recently environment minister in Tony Blair's government, added a lot of credibility to conspiracy theories about the 9/11.
The Underlying Politics of 9/11 Part 1
Watch this video until the end.
- Fareed Zakaria: Former ISI Head In Pakistan Says 911 Was An Inside Job - This is the former head of the Pakistani version of the CIA.
- We are told that Mohamed Atta was one of the so called hijackers. We also know that a man using the name of the head of the Pakistani ISI, Mustafa Muhammad Ahmad, wired Atta over $100,000 prior to the attack. This is confirmed in this CNN news item. This, in essence, is a man who is known as one of the bankrollers of 9/11 yet he was not wanted for questioning by the Kean Comission. When asked about this Kean openly stated that the people who bankrolled 9/11 were not of significant interest to the report. Does this make any sense whatsoever? Here is one of several known events where Kean openly admits to this:
- We are told that flight 93 crashed at the hands of heroic passengers who tried to overpower the hijackers. At the crash scene there was nothing resembling a plane crash. No parts, no bodies, almost nothing. We are told that the plane vaporized. Planes do not vaporize. We lost a space shuttle traveling at 18,000 miles per hour over one third of this nation, and parts were found. Body parts were found. Yet we are told the planes on 9/11 vaporized. Look at the scene...do you think a plane crashed there.
Here is a photo of the parts revovered from the Columbia after it disintegrated and hit the Earth at terminal velocity:
- Flight 77 - What most people do not realize about the crash at the Pentagon is that most video and imagery seen since 9/11 was taken at least 30 minutes after the initial impact. After the initial impact only a small hole in the outer wall was visible. There was no indication that a commercial airline hit the Pentagon. There was no damage where wings, engines or the rudder would have hit. Only one hole, approximately 16' in diameter was visible. The front of the building eventually collapsed and the images of the post collapse damage is what most people have seen. Again we are told that a 100 ton aircraft vaporized.
News reports on that day depict the early state of damage.
How do you feel about body language. How would you respond to the question if you were not guilty?
The Secret Service are springloaded responders. Their job is to protect the president. If someone chewing gum pops a bubble they will jump to protect the president. On 9/11 Bush's schedule was made public. He is in an elementary school in Florida. As he read to the children the first plane already hit the WTC. As he is sitting with the children, his chief of staff Andrew Card whispers in his ear that the second tower was hit and that America was under attack. It is one thing to speculate why the president of the United States did not feel that it was necessary to take action when the nation was under attack (the people who make excuses for this astonish me...we are talking about a nation under attack), but the smoking gun lies in the inaction of the Secret Service.
If it is true that they did not know about the attack details in advance then they had no way of knowing the scope of the attack. It could have very well been a nation-wide, multi-pronged attack using planes, trucks, bombs, whatever. Yet at the time that they, the Secret Serivce, become aware that the nation is indeed under attack, because the second plane hit...THEY TAKE NO ACTION! They acted as if they knew that there was no threat to the president. They acted, as did Bush, as if they were on a schedule. Bush was clearly not supposed to take any action at this point.
Think back to that day. Do you know anyone at all, who when hearing about what was going on continued along with his or her activities? Is there anyone who did not at the very least bolt over to a TV set? Do you know any cops, firemen or emergency workers who finished reading the sports page before jumping into some sort of action, even if it was only to watch on TV? I do...the Secret Service detail guarding the president. And the President...looked like he was simply awaiting instructions.
Think back to when Andrew Card whispers in Bush's ear is informing him that "the nation is under attack!" Is this the actions of a president? Would anyone in the world who is in charge of something that is being attacked, be it a business, a friend or even a possession, react this way? George W. Bush is a man following a schedule. He may not have been informed of the details of the event but he was clearly informed that something was going to happen and he knew that he was waiting for his next instruction.
Senator Bob Graham talks about the report that you were not told about. I watched his press conference live and it was cut short. Compare that to the live full coverage of Kobe Bryant, OJ Simpson or the like.
Standard Defense Procedures Changed - War Games Running
Cynthia McKinney Questions Rumsfeld about the 9-11 War Games
The questions is towards the end of the video.
There is so much more...start asking questions...the answers are out there.
BBC Reported Collapse of WTC Building 7 Early-- TWICE - They were given a cover story before the building came down. They had the reason prepared. They say that the building came down because it had weakened. They announced this more than 20 minutes before the building came down. The building is in the background as they speak. The reporter is in NY. Don't you think that she can see the building standing there? This is a false flag cover story.
Barry Zwicker: NORAD on 9/11: what was the U.S. military doing that day?
Did Cheney issue orders to stop anyone from preventing the hit on the Pentagon?
In 2003, Former Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta testified before the 9/11 Commission:
Mineta: "During the time that the airplane was coming into the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President...the plane is 50 miles out...the plane is 30 miles out....and when it got down to the plane is 10 miles out, the young man also said to the vice president "do the orders still stand?" And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said "Of course the orders still stand, have you heard anything to the contrary!??"
Watch and listen...
More from Jesse on 9/11 and the media.
