President Barack Obama's choice to take charge of the war in Afghanistan Tuesday called "significant growth" of the Afghan army and national police the key to his strategy, but the annual cost of building and maintaining the existing Afghan force is already roughly four times larger than the entire Afghan economy.
Army Lt. Gen. Stanley McChrystal's testimony to the Senate Armed Services Committee, which is considering his nomination to lead U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan, suggested that the U.S. strategy in Afghanistan is likely to cost American taxpayers and NATO member nations billions of dollars for many years.
New U.S. Afghan strategy will cost billions, take years
The latest wave of anxiety followed a statement by Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz, who warned...
Israeli forces killed at least eight people, including three women, in air strike on southern Lebanon,...
Iran says it's suspending talks with U.S. if Israel does not halt its expanding offensive in...
Could it be that Israel’s 30-year narrative about Iran - one that persuaded US President Donald...
