One of Britain's most authoritative judicial figures last night delivered a blistering attack on the invasion of Iraq, describing it as a serious violation of international law, and accusing Britain and the US of acting like a "world vigilante".
Contradicting head-on Lord Goldsmith's advice that the invasion was lawful, Bingham stated: "It was not plain that Iraq had failed to comply in a manner justifying resort to force and there were no strong factual grounds or hard evidence to show that it had." Adding his weight to the body of international legal opinion opposed to the invasion, Bingham said that to argue, as the British government had done, that Britain and the US could unilaterally decide that Iraq had broken UN resolutions "passes belief".
TVNL Comment: It was more like selective vigilantism used as an excuse to proceed with business plans.
Iran has submitted a 14-point response to the U.S. proposal to end the conflict that began...
On 28 February 2026, the first day of the war, the US and Israel launched a...
Senate Democrats called BS, literally, on Donald Trump’s claim that the war in Iran is over,...
In an extraordinary article published on 7 April, the New York Times described how Donald Trump...
