One New York judge ruled the DNA evidence was scientifically sound. Another, just miles away, tossed it out as unreliable.
The same scenario is playing out in courthouses around the world amid a debate over whether a type of DNA analysis involving the amplification of tiny amounts of genetic material is reliable enough to convict someone for a crime.
The technique, known as low-copy number or high-sensitivity analysis can be used when investigators use "touch DNA" and are only able to collect a few human cells left behind when someone touches an object such as a gun, the handle of a knife, or even clothing.
While many prosecutors and forensic experts hail it as powerful tool that can help close cases, critics — most notably the FBI — argue it is inconclusive and unreliable. But there is no clear case law on the merits of the science, leaving judges to evaluate it on a case-by-case basis.
More...
An ancient cat was found almost perfectly preserved in Siberia's permafrost.
Researchers found the mummy of a...
A Nasa astronaut who just returned from the International Space Station has been hospitalized for an...
US government employees have been injured by UFOs and the US government has conducted a secret...
A spacecraft that will study one of Jupiter’s moons launched Monday on a journey of more...
