A federal judge in Boston on Friday ruled the Trump administration can't use an obscure clause relating to agency priorities to make billions of dollars in funding cuts.
Twenty-three states had a filed a lawsuit last year accusing the administration of using the clause to make cuts to everything from crime prevention to food security to scientific research. They were concerned that it would be used to cancel current and future grants.
U.S. District granted a summary judgment preventing the administration from relying on the clause to make cuts and denied a motion by the government to dismiss the case.
"Defendants' interpretation of the Termination Clause is not clearly supported by the text of the provision, runs counter to the regulatory scheme, receives no support in the rulemaking history, and would violate the Spending Clause's requirement that conditions be imposed unambiguously," Talwani, who was nominated by Democratic President Barack Obama, wrote.
During a settler attack aimed at stealing sheep, the Israeli army killed a Palestinian boy and...
Omaha police recently agreed to stop carrying gloves that can deliver electric shocks to students in...
A Pennsylvania police officer was charged on Tuesday with voluntary manslaughter for last week’s fatal shooting...
A recent controversy involving Palestinian medical staff at Haifa’s Rambam Hospital reveals several important things about...
