TV News LIES

Wednesday, Jan 14th

Last update05:10:47 AM GMT

You are here News Of Special Interest Was FBI too quick to judge anthrax suspect the killer?

Was FBI too quick to judge anthrax suspect the killer?

E-mail Print PDF

Bruce IvinsScouring the anthrax-laced mail that took five lives and terrorized the East Coast in 2001, laboratory scientists discovered a unique contaminant — a tiny scientific fingerprint that they hoped would help unmask the killer.

One senior FBI official wrote in March 2007, in a recently declassified memo, that the potential clue "may be the most resolving signature found in the evidence to date." Yet once FBI agents concluded that the likely culprit was Bruce Ivins — a mentally troubled, but widely regarded Army microbiologist — they stopped looking for the contaminant, after testing only a few work spaces of the scores of researchers using the anthrax strain found in the letters.

They quit searching, despite finding no traces of the substance in hundreds of environmental samples from Ivins' lab, office, car and home.

It's been two and a half years since Ivins committed suicide in the face of prosecutors' threats to charge him with five murders, each carrying a potential death sentence. It's been more than a year since the Justice Department, despite lacking hard proof, formally declared that Ivins "perpetrated the anthrax letter attacks."

But the FBI's decision not to fully test for the distinct bacterial contaminant, pieced together by McClatchy in interviews with scientists, federal law enforcement officials and in a review of recently declassified bureau records, could reignite the debate over whether its agents found the real killer.

The Justice Department closed the eight-year investigation, said to cost as much as $100 million. However, none of the circumstantial evidence it found showed that Ivins prepared the deadly powder, scrawled "Death to America" in a seeming mimic of al Qaida, or twice sneaked away on six and a half hour roundtrip drives to drop them in a Princeton, N.J., mailbox.

If the FBI got the right man, then there is no consequence to its decision to stop hunting for bacillus subtilis, a harmless bacterial contaminant that resembles anthrax. But if Ivins was innocent, then the killer is at large, and the bureau may have missed a big opportunity.

Some scientists and ex-colleagues of Ivins, who spent 27 years studying anthrax at the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases at Fort Detrick, Md., remain convinced of his innocence and believe the FBI erred in limiting the testing.

More...


Most Recent Related Stories...


6 Minnesota prosecutors resign over DOJ push to investigate ICE shooting victim’s widow: Reports

Joe Watson The top federal prosecutor on the Minnesota fraud case has reportedly resigned on Tuesday, the...

Zohran Mamdani Has More Jewish Support Than You Think

Mamdani Jewish supportAsk anybody about the Jewish vote for New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani in the election,...

Trump Hurled A 2-Word Insult. It Revealed Something Deeply Troubling About Him — And Our Country.

Trump insult Quiet, PiggyAs a neurologist, I care for some of society’s most vulnerable individuals — children with severe...

A top DoJ official trained Pam Bondi on ethics rules in the department. Then he was fired

Ethics offical fired after talking to BondiJoseph Tirrell was reaching the end of a vacation on 11 July, and watching TV at...
 
America's # 1 Enemy
Tee Shirt
& Help Support TvNewsLIES.org!
TVNL Tee Shirt
 
TVNL TOTE BAG
Conserve our Planet
& Help Support TvNewsLIES.org!
 
Get your 9/11 & Media
Deception Dollars
& Help Support TvNewsLIES.org!
 
The Loaded Deck
The First & the Best!
The Media & Bush Admin Exposed!