A Pentagon public relations program that sought to transform high-profile military analysts into “surrogates” and “message force multipliers” for the Bush administration complied with Defense Department regulations and directives, the Pentagon’s inspector general has concluded after a two-year investigation.
The inquiry was prompted by articles published in The New York Times in 2008 that described how the Pentagon, in the years after the Sept. 11 attacks, cultivated close ties with retired officers who worked as military analysts for television and radio networks.
The articles also showed how military analysts affiliated with defense contractors sometimes used their special access to seek advantage in the competition for contracts. In response to the articles, the Pentagon suspended the program and members of Congress asked the Defense Department’s inspector general to investigate.
In January 2009, the inspector general’s office issued a report that said it had found no wrongdoing in the program. But soon after, the inspector general’s office retracted the entire report, saying it was so riddled with inaccuracies and flaws that none of its conclusions could be relied upon. In late 2009, the inspector general’s office began a new inquiry.
TVNL Comment: Uh...the Pentagon investigates itself and comes up clean? You gotta be kidding.....
Peter Arnett, the Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter who spent decades dodging bullets and bombs to bring the...
U.S. service members — including staff officers and at least one drone pilot — are seeking...
TikTok has signed a deal to spin-off its U.S. operations to a group controlled by mostly...
Being a member of the Pentagon press corps was once one of the more prestigious assignments...
