/cloudfront-us-east-2.images.arcpublishing.com/reuters/AURQKJ4VUJPG7DCW3NDCW6NB4I.jpg)
The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday left in place for now a pandemic-era order allowing U.S. officials to rapidly expel migrants caught at the U.S.-Mexico border in order to consider whether 19 states could challenge the policy's end.
The court on a 5-4 vote granted a request by a group of Republican state attorneys general to put on hold a judge's decision invalidating the emergency public health order known as Title 42 while it considered whether they could intervene to challenge the ruling.
The states had argued lifting the policy could lead to an increase in already-record border crossings. The court said it would hear arguments over the policy in its February session. A ruling is expected by the end of June.
"It breaks my heart that we have to keep waiting," Miguel Colmenares, a Venezuelan migrant in the Mexican border city of Tijuana, said on hearing about the court's decision.
"I don't know what I'm going to do, I haven't got any money and my family's waiting for me," the 27-year-old said.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement has recorded its deadliest year since the early 2000s as agency officials...
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has said Israel has a legal obligation to facilitate the...
Democracy flourishes when Black Americans advance. The evidence is clear: birthright citizenship, constitutional due process, anti-discrimination...
Brooklyn-based writer and reporter Jasper Nathaniel was going through the Turmus Ayya olive fields in the...
