New evidence has emerged in Congressional inquiries that throw more light on the extent to which early knowledge and approval of the abuse went to the highest levels. What does a country do when compelling evidence shows its leaders have authorised international crimes?
Buried away in this testimony lies the most dangerous material of all: evidence which may establish that abuses on detainees in Iraq in September 2003, in the period perhaps including the events at Abu Ghraib, were the result of decisions taken at the highest levels of the administration.
At the very least, the next US president must ensure the full facts are established. It will then be for others to decide what follows. But if the US doesn't get its own house in order and restore its reputation for the rule of law, others will surely step in.
Casualty counts in the last 24 hours: Over the past 24 hours, the bodies of 15...
Israeli occupation forces carried out multiple invasions, home break‑ins, abductions, and movement restrictions across the occupied...
US civil rights pioneer Claudette Colvin, arrested at age 15 for refusing to give up her...
Mohammed Ibrahim wants to run and play soccer again, but the 14-year-old has had three surgeries...
