A key appellate court on Friday concluded prisoners held at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan cannot challenge their captivity through rights granted under the U.S. Constitution.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled that Yemeni native Fadi al Maqaleh and two other men did not enjoy the same habeas rights previously extended by the Supreme Court to Guantanamo Bay detainees.
Citing geographic and other differences between the air base in Afghanistan and the naval base in Cuba, the three-judge panel overturned a trial court's conclusion that the Bagram detainees were constitutionally similar to those held in Guantanamo.
"Guantanamo Bay is a territory that, while technically not a part of the United States, is under the complete and total control of our government," Judge David Sentelle wrote. At Bagram, he added, "the surrounding circumstances are hardly the same."
More...
Salma* was taken aback when her manager sent a message to the staff WhatsApp group instructing...
The charred shell of the Al-Masri family home in the Sabra neighborhood of Gaza City was...
Israeli rights groups have called on the international community to intervene in order to prevent a...
On 16 July, activists launched a digital campaign under the hashtag "They Lied to You" to...
