A key appellate court on Friday concluded prisoners held at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan cannot challenge their captivity through rights granted under the U.S. Constitution.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled that Yemeni native Fadi al Maqaleh and two other men did not enjoy the same habeas rights previously extended by the Supreme Court to Guantanamo Bay detainees.
Citing geographic and other differences between the air base in Afghanistan and the naval base in Cuba, the three-judge panel overturned a trial court's conclusion that the Bagram detainees were constitutionally similar to those held in Guantanamo.
"Guantanamo Bay is a territory that, while technically not a part of the United States, is under the complete and total control of our government," Judge David Sentelle wrote. At Bagram, he added, "the surrounding circumstances are hardly the same."
More...
Poland warned Wednesday that it will respond “together with other countries” after Israeli authorities moved closer...
Stephen Miller, Donald Trump’s immigration czar and the architect of some of the government’s cruelest policies,...
Forces belonging to Libyan military leader Khalifa Haftar have arrested a number of members of a...
World Central Kitchen (WCK) has cut its hot meal distribution in Gaza by half, citing soaring...
