Associate Justice Samuel Alito wrote the opinion for a 6-3 majority, joined by the court's conservatives. Associate Justice Elena Kagan wrote a dissent, joined by the court's liberals, that described the majority opinion as "tragic."
The case, the most significant to deal with voting rights to come before the court since 2013, dealt with two provisions of Arizona's voting law approved long before the 2020 election. State officials passed a law in 2016 barring unions and advocacy organizations from collecting voters' mail-in ballots, a practice that critics call "ballot harvesting."
Scammers in New York have been using gold bars to steal money from victims, primarily older...
Several people with no apparent connection to the Nolan Wells case have been criminally charged with...
A firefighting Sikorsky S64 helicopter with two individuals onboard crashed on Friday morning in a remote...
The Columbia University student workers' union withdrew its demand that the university divest financially from Israel...
