The Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that investigators may resume questioning a suspect who has invoked his Miranda right to remain silent and have a lawyer present if at least 14 days have passed. The 7-2 decision scales back a 1981 case safeguarding rights established in the landmark 1966 Miranda v. Arizona ruling.
Wednesday's case involved a Maryland man accused of sexually abusing his son. Michael Shatzer was in prison on a different offense in 2003 when a police detective tried to question him about the sexual abuse allegations. Shatzer invoked his right to have a lawyer present during the interrogation, and the detective ended the questioning.
Ben & Jerry’s ice-cream in the tub is still great, but the brand’s newest chocolate-covered ice-cream...
A 28-year-old Australian hiker who lost contact with his family while hiking the Continental Divide Trail...
The father of a teenage student who killed two teachers and two classmates in a Georgia...
