 The Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that investigators may resume questioning a suspect who has invoked his Miranda right to remain silent and have a lawyer present if at least 14 days have passed. The 7-2 decision scales back a 1981 case safeguarding rights established in the landmark 1966 Miranda v. Arizona ruling.
The Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that investigators may resume questioning a suspect who has invoked his Miranda right to remain silent and have a lawyer present if at least 14 days have passed. The 7-2 decision scales back a 1981 case safeguarding rights established in the landmark 1966 Miranda v. Arizona ruling.
Wednesday's case involved a Maryland man accused of sexually abusing his son. Michael Shatzer was in prison on a different offense in 2003 when a police detective tried to question him about the sexual abuse allegations. Shatzer invoked his right to have a lawyer present during the interrogation, and the detective ended the questioning.
 
		 
 


 In a nearly unanimous vote, hundreds of victims of child sexual abuse by clergy and other...
In a nearly unanimous vote, hundreds of victims of child sexual abuse by clergy and other... A group of potentially diseased lab monkeys escaped after a vehicle crash on a main interstate...
A group of potentially diseased lab monkeys escaped after a vehicle crash on a main interstate... June Lockhart, who became a mother figure for a generation of television viewers whether at home...
June Lockhart, who became a mother figure for a generation of television viewers whether at home...











































